The Feasibility Study identified six options for renovation and new construction, and baseline of minimum repairs required. One of these options was the co-located school option.
MSBA agreed this was the most cost-effective option to address the needs of both schools. MSBA approved collaborating on co-located middle and high schools.
A co-located -- NOT a combined school -- would be beneficial because:
- Provides efficiencies in shared resources , such as kitchen, plant, library, arts
- Maintains separate identities
- Potential to improve traffic
- Achieves goals for both the facility and programming for 2 schools at one time
- Captures competitive construction market
- Reimbursement rate from MSBA known and maximized
- Renovation projects not necessarily favored by MSBA
- Minimizes disruption to students
In summary, building a co-located middle school and high school is the most cost-effective, educationally appropriate way to meet the long term needs of Duxbury's school children.
Mockups
Preconstruction: Demolition of DMS small gym
Phase 1: Middle School and Core Construction
Phase 2: Existing Middle School demolition
Phase 3: New High School and parking, demolish existing HS Construct parking/fields on DHS site
Mockups
Preconstruction: Demolition of DMS small gym
Phase 1: Middle School and Core Construction
Phase 2: Existing Middle School demolition
Phase 3: New High School and parking, demolish existing HS Construct parking/fields on DHS site